项目来源

韩国国家研究基金(NRF)

项目主持人

김기봉

项目受资助机构

경기대학교

立项年度

2018

立项时间

未公开

项目编号

2018S1A6A4A01029033

项目级别

国家级

研究期限

未知 / 未知

受资助金额

10000000.00韩元

学科

인문학

学科代码

未公开

基金类别

학술·인문사회사업-SD-Research-저술출판지원사업

인문학 ; 인공지능 ; 인문학 3문 ; 교양 ; 호모 나랜스 ; 빅히스토리 ; ‘인문학적 전환’ ; 데이비드 크리스천 ; 유발 하라리 ; 교양교육 ; AI ; Humanaities ; Homo Narrans ; Big data ; AlphaGo ; Singularity ; Post-human ; Biological turn ; Sapiens ; Selfish Gene ; Big history ; Humanism ; "Historia ; Quo Vadis" ; Harari ; Kurzweil ; Dawkins ; Tegmark ; Life1.0 ; Life2.0 ; Life3.0

参与者

未公开

参与机构

未公开

项目标书摘要：Research Summary:Modern historical science has limited the research scope to the past in which the literal records are available,in order to establish itself as a branch of science.So,the scope of history research is not more than 5,000 years.Science,on the contrary,has expanded its scope of knowledge beyond the birth of Homo sapiens to the Big Bang.While history has narrowed the scope of research with a reduction-oriented approach,science has followed a expansion-oriented approach.In order to overcome this paradox,the big History has aimed to explore history by expanding the past of mankind to the greatest extent based on the knowledge of science.Big History represents Wilson's“consilience”that integrates the"two cultures"of humanities and science.But the big History of David Christian,which focuses on the origins of everything is described as"a history without human beings."It is not fun to read his big history,furthermore,its humanistic reflection is poor.The eschatological big story written by Yuval Harari could serve as an alternative model that overcomes the limitations of this origin-oriented big history.In the age of AI,mankind stands at the crossroads of“to be or not to be”.At this critical stage,we need a new model that can synthesize two types of Big histories.This book suggests a new model of Big history to answer three big questions of Humanities:“Where do we come from?What are we?Where are we going?”

Application Abstract: Research Summary:Modern historical science has limited the research scope to the past in which the literal records are available,in order to establish itself as a branch of science.So,the scope of history research is not more than 5,000 years.Science,on the contrary,has expanded its scope of knowledge beyond the birth of Homo sapiens to the Big Bang.While history has narrowed the scope of research with a reduction-oriented approach,science has followed a expansion-oriented approach.In order to overcome this paradox,the big History has aimed to explore history by expanding the past of mankind to the greatest extent based on the knowledge of science.Big History represents Wilson's“consilience”that integrates the"two cultures"of humanities and science.But the big History of David Christian,which focuses on the origins of everything is described as"a history without human beings."It is not fun to read his big history,furthermore,its humanistic reflection is poor.The eschatological big story written by Yuval Harari could serve as an alternative model that overcomes the limitations of this origin-oriented big history.In the age of AI,mankind stands at the crossroads of“to be or not to be”.At this critical stage,we need a new model that can synthesize two types of Big histories.This book suggests a new model of Big history to answer three big questions of Humanities:“Where do we come from?What are we?Where are we going?”