Many interesting solid-state targets for biological research do not form crystalline structures; these materials include intrinsically disordered proteins, plant biopolymer composites, cell-wall polysaccharides, and soil organic matter. The absence of aligned repeating structural elements and atomic-level rigidity presents hurdles to achieving structural elucidation and obtaining functional insights. We describe strategies for adapting several solid-state NMR methods to determine the molecular structures and compositions of these amorphous biosolids.The main spectroscopic problems in studying amorphous structures by NMR are over/under-sampling of the spin signals and spectral complexity. These problems arise in part because amorphous biosolids typically contain a mix of rigid and mobile domains, making it difficult to select a single experiment or set of acquisition conditions that fairly represents all nuclear spins in a carbon-based organic sample. These issues can be addressed by running hybrid experiments, such as using direct excitation alongside cross polarization-based methods, to develop a more holistic picture of the macromolecular system. In situations of spectral crowding or overlap, the structural elucidation strategy can be further assisted by coupling C-13 spins to nuclei such as N-15, filtering out portions of the spectrum, highlighting individual moieties of interest, and adding a second or third spectral dimension to an NMR experiment in order to spread out the resonances and link them pairwise through space or through bonds. We discuss practical aspects and illustrations from the recent literature for 1D experiments that use cross or direct polarization and both homo- and heteronuclear 2D and 3D solid-state NMR experiments.

Many interesting solid-state targets for biological research do not form crystalline structures; these materials include intrinsically disordered proteins, plant biopolymer composites, cell-wall polysaccharides, and soil organic matter. The absence of aligned repeating structural elements and atomic-level rigidity presents hurdles to achieving structural elucidation and obtaining functional insights. We describe strategies for adapting several solid-state NMR methods to determine the molecular structures and compositions of these amorphous biosolids.The main spectroscopic problems in studying amorphous structures by NMR are over/under-sampling of the spin signals and spectral complexity. These problems arise in part because amorphous biosolids typically contain a mix of rigid and mobile domains, making it difficult to select a single experiment or set of acquisition conditions that fairly represents all nuclear spins in a carbon-based organic sample. These issues can be addressed by running hybrid experiments, such as using direct excitation alongside cross polarization-based methods, to develop a more holistic picture of the macromolecular system. In situations of spectral crowding or overlap, the structural elucidation strategy can be further assisted by coupling C-13 spins to nuclei such as N-15, filtering out portions of the spectrum, highlighting individual moieties of interest, and adding a second or third spectral dimension to an NMR experiment in order to spread out the resonances and link them pairwise through space or through bonds. We discuss practical aspects and illustrations from the recent literature for 1D experiments that use cross or direct polarization and both homo- and heteronuclear 2D and 3D solid-state NMR experiments.

The observation that some aspects of amoeba-fungal interactions resemble animal phagocytic cell-fungal interactions, together with the finding that amoeba passage can enhance the virulence of some pathogenic fungi, has stimulated interest in the amoeba as a model system for the study of fungal virulence. Amoeba provide a relatively easy and cheap model system where multiple variables can be controlled for the study of fungi-protozoal (amoeba) interactions. Consequently, there have been significant efforts to study fungal-amoeba interactions in the laboratory, which have already provided new insights into the origin of fungal virulence as well as suggested new avenues for experimentation. In this essay we review the available literature, which highlights the varied nature of amoeba-fungal interactions and suggests some unsolved questions that are potential areas for future investigation. Overall, results from multiple independent groups support the amoeboid predator-fungal animal virulence hypothesis', which posits that fungal cell predation by amoeba can select for traits that also function during animal infection to promote their survival and thus contribute to virulence.

The capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans is its dominant virulence factor and plays a key role in the biology of this fungus. In this essay, we focus on the capsule as a cellular structure and note the limitations inherent in the current methodologies available for its study. Given that no single method can provide the structure of the capsule, our notions of what is the cryptococcal capsule must be arrived at by synthesizing information gathered from very different methodological approaches including microscopy, polysaccharide chemistry and physical chemistry of macromolecules. The emerging picture is one of a carefully regulated dynamic structure that is constantly rearranged as a response to environmental stimulation and cellular replication. In the environment, the capsule protects the fungus against desiccation and phagocytic predators. In animal hosts the capsule functions in both offensive and defensive modes, such that it interferes with immune responses while providing the fungal cell with a defensive shield that is both antiphagocytic and capable of absorbing microbicidal oxidative bursts from phagocytic cells. Finally, we delineate a set of unsolved problems in the cryptococcal capsule field that could provide fertile ground for future investigations.

Historically, antibody-mediated immunity was considered effective against toxins, extracellular pathogens and viruses, while control of intracellular pathogens was the domain of cellular immunity. However, numerous observations in recent decades have conclusively shown that antibody can protect against intracellular pathogens. This paradigmatic shift has tremendous implications for immunology and vaccine design. For immunology the observation that antibody can protect against intracellular pathogens has led to the discovery of new mechanisms of antibody action. For vaccine design the knowledge that humoral immunity can be effective in protection means that the knowledge acquired in more than a century of antibody studies can be applied to make new vaccines against this class of pathogens.

In every epidemic some individuals become sick and some may die, whereas others recover from illness and still others show no signs or symptoms of disease. These differences highlight a fundamental question of microbial pathogenesis: why are some individuals susceptible to infectious diseases while others who acquire the same microbe remain well? For most of human history, the answer assumed the hand of providence. With the advent of the germ theory of disease, the focus on disease causality became the microbe, but this did not explain how there can be different outcomes of infection in different individuals with the same microbe. Here we examine the attributes of susceptibility in the context of the "damage-response framework" of microbial pathogenesis. We identify 11 attributes that, although not independent, are sufficiently distinct to be considered separately: microbiome, inoculum, sex, temperature, environment, age, chance, history, immunity, nutrition, and genetics. We use the first letter of each to create the mnemonic MISTEACHING, underscoring the need for caution in accepting dogma and attributing disease causality to any single factor. For both populations and individuals, variations in the attributes that assemble into MISTEACHING can create an enormity of combinations that can in turn translate into different outcomes of host-microbe encounters. Combinatorial diversity among the 11 attributes makes identifying "signatures" of susceptibility possible. However, with their inevitable uncertainties and propensity to change, there may still be a low likelihood for prediction with regard to individual host-microbe interactions, although probabilistic prediction may be possible.

Cryptococcus neoformans is not usually considered a cytotoxic fungal pathogen but there is considerable evidence that this microbe can damage host cells and tissues. In this essay, we review the evidence that C. neoformans damages host cells and note that the mechanisms involved are diverse. We consider C. neoformans-mediated host damage at the molecular, cellular, tissue, and organism level. Direct mechanisms of cytotoxicity include lytic exocytosis, organelle dysfunction, phagolysosomal membrane damage, and cytoskeletal alterations. Cytotoxicity contributes to pathogenesis by interfering with immune effector cell function and disrupting endothelial barriers thus allowing dissemination. When C. neoformans-mediated and immune-mediated host damage is sufficient to affect homeostasis, cryptococcosis occurs at the organism level.